| 1–2 | Diagnose unfamiliar mixed reasoning Map the actual test date and priority gaps | Component baseline and calendar |
| 3–4 | Audit samples and denominators Choose discriminating missing evidence | Supported claim with limits |
| 5–6 | Map reasons and intermediate conclusions Evaluate assumptions and alternatives | Argument structure critique |
| 7–8 | Translate compound rules precisely Use countermodels and truth tables | Complete allowed-case table |
| 9–10 | Combine dependencies and capacities Prove an optimum by bound and witness | Feasible optimal schedule |
| 11–12 | Compare rates and pricing models Check boundaries and sufficient data | Model-and-unit audit |
| 13–14 | Coordinate transformations and viewpoints Use complete spatial representations | Two-method spatial check |
| 15–16 | Trace and test algorithms Disprove a greedy claim with a counterexample | Algorithm repair |
| 17–18 | Use the current official online interface Attempt short mixed sets without overloading | Familiarity and error log |
| 19–20 | Consolidate persistent errors Review a limited timed sample when appropriate | Test-window readiness review |
| 21–22 | Rebuild a problem in a new context Compare two valid reasoning methods | Transfer portfolio |
| 23–24 | Evaluate an evidence-gathering plan Distinguish ethical observation from invented proof | Investigation design |
| 25–26 | Apply a stated principle consistently Repair a flawed or overstrong conclusion | Reasoned argument revision |
| 27–28 | Find all solutions and a decisive clue Explain uniqueness without guessing | Original constraint puzzle |
| 29–30 | Explore a quantitative counterexample Prove a boundary or general relationship | Secondary-bridge investigation |
| 31–32 | Compare differently drawn networks Bound hidden spatial quantities | Representation comparison |
| 33–34 | State algorithm correctness conditions Test smallest and extreme allowed inputs | Procedure specification |
| 35–36 | Design an original mixed challenge set Peer-check wording and answer uniqueness | Reviewed task bank |
| 37–38 | Present a substantial investigation Respond to a challenge and revise the model | Evidence-based presentation |
| 39–40 | Complete the Year 6 checkpoint Plan continued learning beyond admission decisions | Final portfolio and next steps |